I’ve created an extension method to Find Sibling Activity by name
Based on example from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163414.aspx
public static TActivity FindSiblingActivity<TActivity>(this Activity sender,string activityName) where TActivity:Activity
//CodeActivity thisActivityInstance = sender as CodeActivity;sender.
Activity parent = sender.Parent;
var retActivity=parent.GetActivityByName(activityName) as TActivity;
Debug.Assert(sender.IsDynamicActivity==retActivity.IsDynamicActivity,” EXPECTED BOTH BE DYNAMIC”);
Related links http://geekswithblogs.net/mnf/archive/2009/04/21/workflow-activities-should-be-referred-by-sender-object-or.aspx
Below is an extension method to find root Parent Workflow of current activity
/// Get root Parent Workflow of current activity
/// <param name=”activity”></param>
public static Activity FindRootWorkflow(this Activity activity)
List<string> list = new List<string>();
Activity act = activity;
while (act != null)
act = act.Parent;
I have a project with a few workflows. I created a custom activity and I’ve added it to the same project.
But then I found that I am not able to insert/drag it to my workflow.
The only solution, that I found, was to create a separate Activity Library, move my custom activity to the library, and add a reference to the library from Workflow Project.
It looks like that you unable to Refer to Activity from workflow in the same project.
Download from ActivityExecutionContext in Workflows
caused “The project type is not supported by this installation” when opened the solution.
On my machine I have Workflow only for VS 2008, but not for VS 2005, but the download solution was in 2005 format.
I’ve explicitely started VS 2008 and then converted solution from 2005 to 2008. Error disappeared.
Similar problem with Moral: If you are trying to develop with .NET 3.0 maybe it’s a good idea to check that .NET 3.0 is installed first… described here
In our Workflow application it was created a lot of Workflow level Dependency properties that was used to interchange data between different activities.
We believed that is a safe way to avoid concurrency problems. But it was WRONG.
Article ActivityExecutionContext in Workflows explains, that Workflow properties as a shared data between activities is not a safe method and can cause concurrency errors in case of CAG or similar usage.
Best solution is to use custom activities Dependency properties and direct binding between activities.
The primary advantage to dependency properties is that they allow binding of property values to instance data at runtime. For example, you can bind the input property of one activity to an output property of another. The actual property values resulting from the binding is determined at runtime. Dependency properties are required when you want to bind properties from one activity to another. However, if you are binding an activity property to a workflow property, the workflow property is not required to be a dependency property. In this case, a normal C# property on the workflow class works fine.
A dependency property is a powerful mechanism that helps you expose activity properties so they can be bound and shared within a workflow instance. There is a small performance overhead associated with this property type, especially when many dependency properties are being accessed from the workflow, but in most cases the overhead should be minimal.
In Windows Workflow I had a Replicator Activity inside While Activity. In Replicator _Initialized
event handler I’ve set the InitialChildData
property of the activity with the list of my objects, but Replicator didn’t invoke any _ChildInitialized event , but went directly to _Completed event (similar problem was reported in the thread ReplicatorActivity shows all children complete when they aren’t
). I tried to change a few things without success.It was also confusing that even in Initialized AllChildrenComplete property was true. I compared my code with exampe from excellent WF Tutorial: Using the Replicator for Windows Workflow Foundation, but didn’t find any essential differences.
If you want to avoid issues, learn to access activity properties in a context safe way (using the sender object or e.Activity) so that you do it right when it counts.
// WRONG CODE
this.delayActivity1.TimeoutDuration = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(iterationCount);
// RIGHT CODE
((DelayActivity)sender).TimeoutDuration = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(iterationCount);
// RIGHT CODE
CallExternalMethodActiivty act = e.Activity.GetActivityByName(“createTask1”, true) as CallExternalMethodActivity;
act.ParameterBindings[“userName”].Value = e.InstanceData;
Use sender or e.Activity instead of this. e.Activity is the clone of the replicator’s template. Second, we have passed the parameter true to GetActivityByName. This tells the method to look only in the context of the activity on which it was called. This keeps the method from walking into other parts of the tree and returning the RootContext instance.
The issue also described in “Pro WF” By Bruce Bukovics access activities in a context safe way section and in ActivityExecutionContext in Workflows article.
Note, that IsDynamicActivity Property can be used to determine was activity spawned or is executing within the default ActivityExecutionContext of the workflow instance.
I hope that Microsoft will change the syntax of event handlers to separate workflow templates and instances to avoid these not-intuitive errors or at least will generate warnings if code is not context-safe(see my MS connect suggestion).
In Visual Studio Debugger for Windows Workflow Foundation you MUST set the workflow DLL project as the Visual Studio solution startup project to debug the workflow using F5
Documented in http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb483186.aspx
It is not intuitive restriction.
I’ve posted to MS Feedback that it will be good to support workflow Debugging from any startup project.
Recently I’ve noticed, that if workflow DLL project is a startup project, it doesn’t support Edit&Continue in a code dlls. Another thing that MS should improve. It’s similar to ASP.Net Web Site limitation of Edit&Continue.
I also not able to open activity from call-stack- see my post Windows Workflow: Concatenate all parents QualifiedNames- instead of call stack